Blog Post 4

In this week’s blog post, I will be critiquing the Alzheimers Society YouTube on “What is Alzheimer’s disease”. I will be discussing how the video fits interaction and technological design principles, and suggesting ways to improve engagement. Please see the following link to the video below!

Alzheimers Society. (2017). What is Alzheimer’s disease? Retrieved from YouTube.

What activity could you suggest that they do after they have watched the video (designed)? What type of knowledge or skill would that activity help develop? What medium or technology would students use to do the activity?

After watching this video I suggest students should take a test addressing the various key points discussed in this video. This is because the content covered in this video covers the philological effects and treatment options of Alzheimer’s disease. This would be information that students would take notes on while watching. Since it is hard to demonstrate within a role-play or interactive activity (as are dealing with physiological brain alterations) a test would best ensure students have an adequate understanding of the material addressed.

Coming from a science background, most assessments on learning comprehension were tests. In some cases, sometimes I found tests to be a bit redundant and repetitive- especially when they are all one question type. To help keep the assessment more dynamic for students, I would like to include a variety of question types, such as multiple-choice, true or false, and fill-in-the-blank. This will help to ensure students are engaged throughout the process.

A test would help students develop their critical thinking and active recall skills. This is because- the student will have to manipulate and apply their knowledge to the answers available to come to the correct conclusion. Additionally, students must actively recall/remember the information studied and apply it to the answers available.

I suggest this test be taken online on Google Forms.

How would students get feedback on the activity that you set? What medium or technology would they and/or you use for getting and giving feedback on their activity?

The online quiz I suggested for the video above will be taken via Google Forms. Students will get feedback on their answers as Google Forms allows users to view the question they got correct/ incorrect after the quiz has been submitted. I always found instant feedback helpful as a student, because you could review your mistakes right there and then. Rather than coming back to it, a few days/ weeks later when the knowledge is less fresh in your head. Also, Google Forms has the option for students to re-take and view their answers after submitting. This allows them to review their mistakes and see the topics they are struggling with- and rewatch the video/ask questions to help better their understanding of the material and do better next attempt.

How much work for you would that activity cause? Would the work be both manageable and worthwhile? Could the activity be scaled for larger numbers of students?

This activity would not cause that much work as a teacher. The most time-consuming portion would be developing questions that accurately test and apply the knowledge gained from the video. This is because as a teacher it is important to gauge the material and learning outcome from an activity to ensure students are meeting the learning desired requirements. I have used Google Forms in the past. It is a very user-friendly and simple platform- entering the material into the site itself would not be that much work.

This activity could reach a large scale of students. Only the YouTube video and quiz link are needed for students to complete the task.

How could the video have been designed to generate more or better activity from viewers or students?

The video moves the completed topic very quickly. So giving an overview brief summary of the key points and topics covered will aid students. As a student, I find this helpful as it prepares me for the important to come and ensures I have not missed any key ideas. Additionally, having time stamps for each topic covered- would help students easily rewatch the points they missed or need more clarification on. Rather than scrolling and trying to find the exact second they missed- which can be quite frustrating.

Next, the subtitles have a few mistakes. This makes it difficult for those who are hearing impaired or working in loud environments to follow the video along. Fixing these little mistakes would greatly improve the experience for non-audio users.

Blog Post 3

Choose one (or more) of your planned learning activities from your Blueprint and identify any barriers to student success. How can you alter or adjust your current plan to reduce those barriers?

One of our learning activities for our final project on Alzeminers includes a role-play activity where students are assigned the role of a doctor, nurse, patient and family member of a person with Alzheimer’s. The student has to research what the disease is like from their perspective from provided educational videos and readings. After the role-play activity students will come together in their small groups, to write a paper making suggestions to the Ministry of Health- to assist those impacted Alzheimer’s disease.

In order to ensure this experience is inclusive for all- the provided videos should include accurate subtitles. This will assist students with hearing impairment or who are working in loud environments- as they will be able to read the audio to follow along with the resource, rather than fully relying on the audio description. Moreover, the subtitles will be reviewed and corrected to ensure they are accurate. In some cases, subtitles can have errors, in translation- which can be confusing for the reader- especially if they are not relying on the audio description whatsoever. Therefore, ensuring the subtitles provided are correct is critical for the student’s experience.

Next, the reading materials involved in the research/role-play activity should be available beforehand for students to review before/after class. This will assist students with reading impairments such as dyslexia. Reading large bodies of material on tight deadlines can be challenging for all. So providing the options to review the material before/ after class to help those who need special accommodations will create a less stressful learning environment. This will ensure that students with dyslexia or other reading impairments have a fair opportunity to review and understand the material- rather than focus their energy on keeping up with others.

Finally, to make the group paper portion more accessible- students will be given class time to work on it and have the option to hand in a written copy as well as digital. Arranging a time to work on group projects can be difficult, especially for students who work or have other responsibilities outside of class. Therefore, providing some class time to work together can assist students in at least starting a baseline for their report. This can help take some pressure off the assignment and give students a head start on writing! Furthermore, giving students the option to hand in a written rather than a digital copy of the report- can assist those who do not have access to a computer/ digital device. Typically students have access to some digital device or computer, however, that is not always the case. Thus, having the option to hand in a written report can accommodate students who don’t have access to the internet or digital devices at home.

Blog Post 2

In this blog post, I will give an overview of the research I gathered on inquiry-based design and explain how it is/is not applied to my group’s learning blueprint on Alzheimer’s disease.

Inquiry-based design

Inquiry-based design is a learning approach that encourages students to acquire knowledge to feed their interests on a topic (Queen’s University, 2024). This is a highly individualist learning approach- where the student takes charge of their education, rather than relying on their teacher to guide them through a lesson. In inquiry-based design, students can ask questions about the given material and its gaps, research to gather information to help them address their questions, evaluate their corresponding resources, and synthesise their knowledge (Lee et al. 2004). Inquiry-based design is non-linear and ever-changing. Learning outcomes and material can be adjusted depending on the direction the student’s research takes and their given findings. Based on my past educational experience with inquiry-based design- you definitely get what you put out. For example, the more research a student puts in or the can and effort put into asking/answering meaningful questions to determine that learning will achieved from their studies.

My experience with inquiry-based learning

Coming from a science background, inquiry-based design was something that was used a lot specifically in lab settings. In the previous animal behaviour class I took our final research project was to observe an animal species- choosing and describing the meaning of their movement patterns. This required inquiry-based learning design because we as a group had to research our specific animal species and narrow down the movement patterns we were interested in and wanted to study. Next, we had to spend hours observing the animals and recording when and what provoked certain movements. The more observations and knowledge we gain about the animals the more our research questions switch directions and evolve. Finally, we had to present our ideas and findings, using critical thinking skills to justify our results. Thus, not only does inquiry-based design teach students information research skills, but it always facilitates other important life skills such as; critical thinking, time management, and self-reflection (Queen’s University, 2024).

How inquiry-based design aligns with our blueprint

For our blueprint, my group chose to design a course teaching the basics of Alzehimers to university-aged students. In my opinion, I think that inquiry-based design principles are not very applicable to our lesson. This is because, in our course, we as teachers are very specific about our learning outcomes and the learning activities designed and are very tailored and specific to meet these needs. Therefore, there is little room for creative freedom and self-directed study. For instance, one of the learning and associated activities is to effectively understand/identify the brain regions affected by Alzheimer’s disease. With this specific example, students do not have much room to explore their personal interests on the subject- rather just stick to the material and answer the questions at hand.

References

Lee, V. S., Greene, D. B., Odom, J., Schechter, E., & Slatta, R. W. (2004). What is inquiry guided learning. In V. S. Lee (Ed.), Teaching and learning through inquiry: A guidebook for institutions and instructors (pp. 3-15). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Queen’s Univeristy (2024). Inquiry-Based Learning. Queen’s University: Center for Teaching and Learning. https://www.queensu.ca/ctl/resources/instructional-strategies/inquiry-based-learning

Blog Post 1

From what you’ve seen of the course so far and in the course outline, which of the assessment strategies in your reading this week are being used in this course?

From what I’ve seen in the course/course routine so far, I think this course uses a combination of formative and summative assessment strategies.

I think that EDCI 355 utilizes the “purpose” and “focus” aspects of formative assessment. For example, this course displays “purpose” as it has many opportunities to get feedback on the work we submit. Whether it’s from comments on our peers’ blog posts, interacting with classmates and instructors on Mattermost, or receiving instructor comments from graded assessments- this class allows for many opportunities for others to review your work and receive commentary on your understanding of the material. As a learner, I think having multiple access points for questions and discussions is really beneficial. For me personally, hearing other opinions on my work and understanding of the material solidify my understanding of the topic. Not only if it, nice to it’s nice to hear that not only are you making a mark as a student by meeting the instructor’s standards, but when my peers connect to my work I find this very meaningful. Moreover, this class displays “focus” as the class activities are meant for us students to use the skills we acquire. For example, when glancing at the course outline I can see that each week we have teaching activities and readings oriented teaching us different learning theories and design strategies in technological environments. And for our final project, we get to work with classmates to use and apply the skills we have learned during the class, by designing a course as a group. Rather than just learning the skills to memorize and regurgitate them in a multiple-choice test.

However, I think that this course uses “grading” and “effort” from summative assessment. This is because, unlike in formative assessment, we do receive traditional grades on assignments in this course. Along, with a grade with do receive written feedback, which allows us students the opportunity for growth and to learn from our mistakes for the next assignment. Additionally, I think this course is a high-effort class. For me as a student to understand the connect I have to put time and effort into connecting and familiarising myself with the material, to ensure I have an understanding of the required topics.

Which assessment strategies are not being used?

It’s hard for me to state if the class necessary fully excludes any assessment strategies- being so fresh onto things. However, based on my experience so far I have not seen much of an authentic assessment. This is because, during the first 2 weeks of the class I feel as though I have not learned enough yet to apply the theories to real-world applications. I am sure this will change as we quickly progress, and build on the foundation set at the beginning of the course. That being said, I am excited to see where the course will take us, and I hope I’ll be able to apply the skills I have learned in the future!

What learning theories do these connect to?

Based on my readings from week 1, I think that this course connects self-efficacy and self-determination theories in motivation. I think it connects with self-efficacy because we are provided with lots of student support. By creating a communal learning environment and support group via MattermostI was able to have my questions easily and promptly answered, making it easy to want to feel like you are able to do well and understand the material. Receiving detailed feedback and having open discussions about the content creates a nonstressful learning environment. Thus, as a student the added educational and social support in the course makes me feel confident in myself and my abilities, encouraging me to feel capable and believe I can do well in this course. Also, I think EDCI 355 along with most courses uses self-determination theory since we get graded in this class. Most students typically want to do well and get good grades in the courses they take. Therefore, by being marked and assignment letter grades to assignments, it motivates me as a student to do well in the class and receive a good grade.

How does it compare to other courses you’ve taken in your studies?

Coming from a science background- previous courses I have taken, have not encouraged a self-efficacy motivation. First, this is because they were very individualist and did not allow for much opportunity to engage in questions and open discussion about the material. There were no platforms set up to connect with peers and chat receive feedback and discuss the course content openly- which as a student felt very isolating. Next, most teachers did not offer open office hours- usually, we had a small window before and after class to ask a brief question about the content. Making it difficult to have the opportunity to get questions and concerns addressed. Lastly, upper year since classes are very exam-heavy. For example, the assessment for a course I have taken in the past just consisted of 2 exams total. This made the course very stressful, and difficult to gauge my understanding of the topics, as I never felt comfortable enough with the material due to the scarce amount of assessment and feedback. Overall, these factors contributed to a tough and high-stress learning environment. These factors made it difficult to trust in myself and believe I was capable of doing well in these classes. Ultimately creating a low self-efficacy.